Find Mark Wahlberg on Facebook

MarkWahlberg.com Forum Index MarkWahlberg.com
The Official Web Site
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Click here to visit the Mark Wahlberg Youth Foundation
Baby #4?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarkWahlberg.com Forum Index -> Mark Wahlberg Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Raee



Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 1137
Location: Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:58 am    Post subject: Baby #4? Reply with quote

http://www.scandalist.com/2009-03-19/a-fourth-kid-for-mark-wahlberg/

I don't know how true to facts it is, but it's rumoured.....

However, if true. Congratulations! Smile
If not, well, media is a teaser isn't it?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
efactor
Call Me ''E''


Joined: 03 Aug 1999
Posts: 371
Location: New YORK.NY

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

not true...not now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raee



Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 1137
Location: Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I had doubts. Thanks for correcting the rumour E! Smile
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ButtercuplovesMark



Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 2092
Location: Wahlberg Island

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks E, for correcting the rumor. Brandon is only 5 months old..It's very hard on women, to be pregnant that closer together. She just had Brandon, like 5 months ago.


Media, where in the world, did they get this rumor from?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Raee



Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 1137
Location: Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They probably just wanted some "ATTENTION"... and the news did fly pretty quickly and lengthy...

But it was way too sudden and off-topic aye? Weird.
I guess they wanted a "oo-ahh" story especially with what they were saying before. With the whole "is Mark having troubles at home?" -- they wanted to make a drama when it's just not happening. Complete bafoons really.

Never take MEDIA seriously. Until you have cold-hard-facts I say.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ButtercuplovesMark



Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 2092
Location: Wahlberg Island

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raee wrote:
They probably just wanted some "ATTENTION"... and the news did fly pretty quickly and lengthy...

But it was way too sudden and off-topic aye? Weird.
I guess they wanted a "oo-ahh" story especially with what they were saying before. With the whole "is Mark having troubles at home?" -- they wanted to make a drama when it's just not happening. Complete bafoons really.

Never take MEDIA seriously. Until you have cold-hard-facts I say.



I dont take them seriously @ all. Unless it comes from Mark mouths. media, just want to cause all this drama.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
*Sabrina*



Joined: 04 Dec 2007
Posts: 840
Location: the Netherlands

PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

then you really know it's true. it would be fast if it was true
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarkWahlberg.com Forum Index -> Mark Wahlberg Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group